在美为穷人子女申请免费读大学的机构

乡下人

多谢亚1的到来,我会传更多的公仔给您看.我以为2009年开始就来个自弹自唱.再次感谢您的欣赏.

乡下人

这位是出生在纽约市也住在纽约的高中生,2007年获选2008年秋进入在美国费城附近的一间大学.

Ester Lee Sunnyside, New York Swarthmore College, Class of 2012 Ester Lee was born and raised in New York. She grew up taking care ofher younger brother while her parents worked to provide for theirchildren. She is very active within her community and her church. Sheis a choir member, a youth group officer and set up a tutoring programfor underprivileged children in the neighborhood. She is also veryinterested in directing and is the local leader for the church dramateam. Ester manages to balance these activities along with her familyresponsibilities which entail taking care for her younger sibling. Sheunderstands the importance of an education and is grateful for theopportunity to attend Swarthmore College

乡下人

这位姓刘的男孩住在加洲,2007年获选2008年秋入Trinity大学.在Hartford,CT

Timothy Liu Arcadia, California Trinity College, Class of 2012 Timothy is a cheerful, easygoing character, unique in his optimismduring even the toughest of times, giving him the confidence toapproach academic and social problems with rationale on his mind and asmile on his face. Timothy is as bright socially as he is sharpacademically, cheering up his fellow peers when they are faced withstruggles or helping them with their schoolwork. His down-to-earthpersonality, tinged with optimism, puts life in a positive light,allowing his friends to share his unique perspective of the world, onefull of hope and trust in the goodness of humanity yet one that isfounded on reason and avoids foolish idealism. Such an attitude allowshim to adapt to any environment and any group of people anywhere in theworld, a skill necessary for one as interested in traveling as he is.While in college, Timothy wishes to study abroad to enrich hisunderstanding of different cultures.

韩雪1

乡下人;你的资料很丰富,详细。虽然那些鸡肠字不懂但可以看你中文解释。我有空会来看看呵，辛苦你了请你饮杯热茶。

乡下人

她的名字叫余肖瑜(译音),现住纽约布碌伦,她是2001年九月移民来美,当时她一句英文也不懂,她知道她唯一是结识朋友,做一个乐干主义者.她记得当她小学毕业时,她的老师在她毕业年册上写上\"有辛勤的努力将会有辛勤的回報“.她也是靠这句话,和自己的努力,获得Wesleyan University, 大学四年免费,2009年秋季生.

Xiaoyu Yu Brooklyn, New York Wesleyan University, Class of 2013 Xiaoyu is an immigrant who came to the United States in September of2001. Although she did not know any English at the time, she knew shestill had one tool to make friends – an optimistic attitude. When shegraduated from elementary school, her teacher wrote in her yearbook: \"Apositive attitude will always lead to positive rewards.\" Wherever shehas gone from then on, she always keeps a positive attitude and thewillingness to help (and learn from) others. She is a devoted volunteerwho goes to the library on a regular basis to contribute to hercommunity. Xiaoyu wants to take this opportunity for all the effortsthe QuestBridge team has put in to help her get into college in thebest way possible

nomad

请问有什么奖学金不看家庭收入的? fficeffice\" />

政府和大学的助学金都是根据学生的家庭收入提供的. 因此贫穷家庭的学生能免费上昂贵的私立学校, 而中产阶级或中上阶级的学生却有困难支付名校的学费

韩雪1

乡下人;有你的指引你儿子一定也是个优秀学生，你所付出的努力同样也会有回报的。

乡下人

多谢亚1的赞词.
能获得四年免费读大学的确省下许多钱.这个机构的26间大学平均年费用为5万元左右,四年下来也是20万美元.这对我们贫下中农是个天文数字了.在美国做工赚到的钱要缴所得税,一般税率在二十几到三十,也就是说赚十元线就去了三元钱的所得税,余下七元钱买用品等要交零售税,在纽约应该是7%点多零售税.(食物原料不用税,但成品食物要纳税.)其实到手的钱不多.想全凭手上的钱来付学,那就惨了.在美国,许多中国人为了谋生赚钱养家而很少注意孩子的学习,而且现社会的年轻人也看不起从大陆来的父母,认为父母不懂英文,思想落后,形成父母和子女不能朝一个共同目标走.能让孩子读好书,拿到助学金,这也是条财路.因为助学金和奖学金是免税的.

乡下人

nomad:在回答你的问题之前请看2009年的最平宜的学校,也就是最多助学金的学校的排名:
<div id=\"branding-section\">

Best Colleges 2009

<div id=\"promo-magazine\">

• Article Index
• Subscribe

</div> <div id=\"nav-breadcrumb\">Home >Education >Best Colleges</div></div> <div class=\"table-blurb\">

Best Colleges: Best Values: National Universities

Methodology

</div>

Harvard University哈佛 Cambridge, MA	Rank 1	Percent receiving need-based grants: 51 %	Average discount from total cost: 68 %
Princeton University普林斯顿 Princeton, NJ	Rank 2	Percent receiving need-based grants: 53 %	Average discount from total cost: 66 %
Yale University耶鲁 New Haven, CT	Rank 3	Percent receiving need-based grants: 42 %	Average discount from total cost: 64 %
Massachusetts Institute of Technology麻省理工 Cambridge, MA	Rank 4	Percent receiving need-based grants: 61 %	Average discount from total cost: 59 %
Stanford University史旦弗 Stanford, CA	Rank 5	Percent receiving need-based grants: 42 %	Average discount from total cost: 63 %
California Institute of 、Technology加洲理工 Pasadena, CA	Rank 6	Percent receiving need-based grants: 52 %	Average discount from total cost: 56 %
Dartmouth College达明 Hanover, NH	Rank 7	Percent receiving need-based grants: 50 %	Average discount from total cost: 60 %
Columbia University哥伦比亚 New York, NY	Rank 8	Percent receiving need-based grants: 46 %	Average discount from total cost: 60 %
University of North 北卡Carolina--Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC	Rank 9	Percent receiving need-based grants: 35 %	Average discount from total cost: 50 %
Rice University丽斯 Houston, TX	Rank 10	Percent receiving need-based grants: 34 %	Average discount from total cost: 53 %
University of Pennsylvania 宾州 Philadelphia, PA	Rank 11	Percent receiving need-based grants: 40 %	Average discount from total cost: 55 %
Duke University度克 Durham, NC	Rank 12	Percent receiving need-based grants: 38 %	Average discount from total cost: 55 %
University of Chicago芝加哥 Chicago, IL	Rank 13	Percent receiving need-based grants: 43 %	Average discount from total cost: 53 %
Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN	Rank 14	Percent receiving need-based grants: 38 %	Average discount from total cost: 57 %
SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse, NY	Rank 15	Percent receiving need-based grants: 80 %	Average discount from total cost: 40 %
University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA	Rank 16	Percent receiving need-based grants: 24 %	Average discount from total cost: 52 %
Brown University Providence, RI	Rank 17	Percent receiving need-based grants: 42 %	Average discount from total cost: 51 %
Emory University Atlanta, GA	Rank 18	Percent receiving need-based grants: 36 %	Average discount from total cost: 53 %
Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD	Rank 19	Percent receiving need-based grants: 39 %	Average

乡下人

(续)

Northwestern University Evanston, IL	Rank 20	Percent receiving need-based grants: 41 %	Average discount from total cost: 48 %
University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN	Rank 21	Percent receiving need-based grants: 44 %	Average discount from total cost: 48 %
Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis, MO	Rank 22	Percent receiving need-based grants: 40 %	Average discount from total cost: 48 %
North Carolina State University--Raleigh Raleigh, NC	Rank 23	Percent receiving need-based grants: 43 %	Average discount from total cost: 49 %
Cornell University Ithaca, NY	Rank 24	Percent receiving need-based grants: 39 %	Average discount from total cost: 44 %
Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, OH	Rank 25	Percent receiving need-based grants: 62 %	Average discount from total cost: 45 %
University of Rochester Rochester, NY	Rank 26	Percent receiving need-based grants: 52 %	Average discount from total cost: 49 %
Lehigh University Bethlehem, PA	Rank 27	Percent receiving need-based grants: 43 %	Average discount from total cost: 51 %
Tufts University Medford, MA	Rank 28	Percent receiving need-based grants: 35 %	Average discount from total cost: 51 %
Brandeis University Waltham, MA	Rank 29	Percent receiving need-based grants: 45 %	Average discount from total cost: 47 %
Wake Forest University Winston-Salem, NC	Rank 30	Percent receiving need-based grants: 31 %	Average discount from total cost: 50 %
Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA	Rank 31	Percent receiving need-based grants: 46 %	Average discount from total cost: 39 %
Georgetown University Washington, DC	Rank 32	Percent receiving need-based grants: 37 %	Average discount from total cost: 46 %
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, NY	Rank 33	Percent receiving need-based grants: 60 %	Average discount from total cost: 42 %
Texas A&M University--College Station College Station, TX	Rank 34	Percent receiving need-based grants: 32 %	Average discount from total cost: 40 %
Howard University Washington, DC	Rank 35	Percent receiving need-based grants: 35 %	Average discount from total cost: 44 %
University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA	Rank 36	Percent receiving need-based grants: 36 %	Average discount from total cost: 45 %
Pepperdine University Malibu, CA	Rank 37	Percent receiving need-based grants: 37 %	Average discount from total cost: 53 %
Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA	Rank 38	Percent receiving need-based grants: 35 %	Average discount from total cost: 48 %
University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA	Rank 39	Percent receiving need-based grants: 45 %	Average discount from total cost: 37 %
Clark University Worcester, MA	Rank 40	Percent receiving need-based grants: 52 %	Average discount from total cost: 46 %
Yeshiva University New York, NY	Rank 41	Percent receiving need-based grants: 44 %	Average discount from total cost: 45 %
University of Minnesota--Twin Cities Minneapolis, MN	Rank 42	Percent receiving need-based grants: 25 %	Average discount from total cost: 30 %
University of the Pacific Stockton, CA	Rank 43	Percent receiving need-based grants: 64 %	Average discount from total cost: 42 %
Tulane University New Orleans, LA	Rank 44	Percent receiving need-based grants: 39 %	Average discount from total cost: 48 %
Syracuse University Syracuse, NY	Rank 45	Percent receiving need-based grants: 53 %	Average discount from total cost: 39 %
University of Miami Coral Gables, FL	Rank 46	Percent receiving need-based grants: 46 %	Average discount from total cost: 42 %
Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA	Rank 47	Percent receiving need-based grants: 28 %	Average discount from total cost: 28 %
University of California--Berkeley Berkeley, CA	Rank 48	Percent receiving need-based grants: 30 %	Average discount from total cost: 33 %
Loyola University Chicago Chicago, IL	Rank 49	Percent receiving need-based grants: 67 %	Average discount from total cost: 36 %
Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester, MA	Rank 50	Percent receiving need-based grants: 66 %	Average discount from total cost: